On Feb. 13, a U.S House of Representatives subcommitteeÌýheld a hearingÌýon the future of the NLRB following theÌýJan. 25 decisionÌýby an appeals court that President Obama’s recess appointment of members to the board in early 2012 was unconstitutional. The challenge was brought by the ABC-led Coalition for a Democratic Workplace and the ruling invalidates decisions unlawfully made over the past year because the board did not have a quorum.

On Feb. 13, a U.S House of Representatives subcommitteeÌýheld a hearingÌýon the future of the NLRB following theÌýJan. 25 decisionÌýby an appeals court that President Obama’s recess appointment of members to the board in early 2012 was unconstitutional. The challenge was brought by the ABC-led Coalition for a Democratic Workplace and the ruling invalidates decisions unlawfully made over the past year because the board did not have a quorum.

On Feb. 13, a U.S House of Representatives subcommitteeÌýheld a hearingÌýon the future of the NLRB following theÌýJan. 25 decisionÌýby an appeals court that President Obama’s recess appointment of members to the board in early 2012 was unconstitutional. The challenge was brought by the ABC-led Coalition for a Democratic Workplace and the ruling invalidates decisions unlawfully made over the past year because the board did not have a quorum.

On Feb. 13, a U.S House of Representatives subcommitteeÌýheld a hearingÌýon the future of the NLRB following theÌýJan. 25 decisionÌýby an appeals court that President Obama’s recess appointment of members to the board in early 2012 was unconstitutional. The challenge was brought by the ABC-led Coalition for a Democratic Workplace and the ruling invalidates decisions unlawfully made over the past year because the board did not have a quorum.

On Feb. 13, a U.S House of Representatives subcommitteeÌýheld a hearingÌýon the future of the NLRB following theÌýJan. 25 decisionÌýby an appeals court that President Obama’s recess appointment of members to the board in early 2012 was unconstitutional. The challenge was brought by the ABC-led Coalition for a Democratic Workplace and the ruling invalidates decisions unlawfully made over the past year because the board did not have a quorum.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) isÌýsoliciting commentsÌýfrom the construction industry on the potential use of a government-mandated project labor agreement (PLA) for a project at the New Mexico Cannon Air Force Base.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) isÌýsoliciting commentsÌýfrom the construction industry on the potential use of a government-mandated project labor agreement (PLA) for a project at the New Mexico Cannon Air Force Base.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) isÌýsoliciting commentsÌýfrom the construction industry on the potential use of a government-mandated project labor agreement (PLA) for a project at the New Mexico Cannon Air Force Base.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) isÌýsoliciting commentsÌýfrom the construction industry on the potential use of a government-mandated project labor agreement (PLA) for a project at the New Mexico Cannon Air Force Base.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) isÌýsoliciting commentsÌýfrom the construction industry on the potential use of a government-mandated project labor agreement (PLA) for a project at the New Mexico Cannon Air Force Base.