![Abortion Bans Straining Health Care System, Medical Experts Say](/sites/default/files/legacy-files/styles/story_hero/public/MicrosoftTeams-image%20%2810%29_0.png?itok=ARLaVU_N)
DURHAM, N.C. -- The rapid spread of very strict abortion bans in some states are leaving health care workers in increasingly difficult positions as they try to care for patients, three Duke Health physicians said Tuesday.
States that enacted abortion bans following the U.S. Supreme Court鈥檚 recent overturning of Roe v. Wade have not adequately considered the complexity and nuance required of pregnancy care, the physicians said, adding they expect maternal morbidity rates to increase.
These health experts spoke to journalists Tuesday in a virtual media briefing. (Replay the briefing on .)
Here are excerpts:
ON PARTICULARLY STRICT ABORTION BANS IN SOME STATES
Dr. Beverly Gray, obstetrician and gynecologist
鈥淲e know the patients in these situations are in grave danger. With the passing of the laws in Texas, it鈥檚 a very strict ban with a very narrow exception for saving the life of the patient.
鈥淓ssentially they were having to watch those patients until they were on the brink of a catastrophic outcome, and then they could take care of them.鈥
鈥淭hat makes it complicated for physicians who are just trying to do the right thing. They鈥檙e trying to give their patients the best advice, the best evidence-based care. And that鈥檚 being limited.鈥
鈥淢any of these bans across the country, we see they seek to prosecute physicians. They seek to scare physicians so that they鈥檙e not taking care of patients in an evidence-based way. That鈥檚 just corroding the trust patients have with their physicians.
鈥淲hat鈥檚 really disheartening is just how quickly these laws are changing, how fast it鈥檚 moving, how quickly patients are being affected all over the country.鈥
鈥淗ow do we tell if someone鈥檚 sick enough? It鈥檚 really hard to say in each individual situation what constitutes enough illness. Do you need one organ failing? Do you need two organs failing? Do you need to be to the point where you鈥檙e bleeding, where you need a blood transfusion?鈥
鈥淧atients are confused. Physicians are confused. Ethicists, lawyers are getting involved in care. That鈥檚 just clouding the issue and creating a situation where we鈥檙e offering worse care for patients.鈥
ON PATIENT CONCERNS
Dr. Megan Clowse, rheumatologist
鈥淚 have certainly heard more interest from women lately about having tubal ligations rather than relying on things like IUD or implant, things we consider long-term, reversible contraception so a woman can change her mind in a few years and decide to get pregnant.鈥
鈥淚 am hearing women who are afraid of having something bad happen to them during a pregnancy to the point where they鈥檙e willing to sacrifice their desire for future children even though they鈥檙e not entirely sure they don鈥檛 want children.鈥
鈥淲e are beginning to have conversations with our patients who are on medications with a risk for long-term birth defects.鈥
Dr. Maria Small, maternal and fetal medicine specialist
鈥淢any of my patients are asking, 鈥業f something is seen, how soon do I have to make a decision if there鈥檚 something major wrong with my baby and I may not want my baby to live with a major birth defect and a severely compromised quality of life?鈥 These are decisions that individuals make on a regular basis. When they have a change in guidelines where those decisions need to be made earlier, it becomes more challenging and it becomes more painful. No one can say for sure what they would do in the circumstance many are put in.鈥
鈥淗aving those options 鈥 the option of ending a pregnancy -- needs to be available to individuals who need it.鈥
鈥淲e are in a maternal health crisis in the United States. We already are dealing with trying to help providers and patients know the warning signs for pregnancy-related conditions that need to be acted upon.鈥
鈥淵ou have conditions where legislators are determining when you can and can鈥檛 act on condition in pregnancy. This is not their role. And many of them have shown us over and over again by their statements have no clue about pregnancy and women鈥檚 health.鈥
鈥淚t really is sad and disturbing that we are fighting so hard to decrease maternal mortality rates and yet we have conditions where people are wondering, 鈥楥an I intervene in this condition that usually is associated with maternal death, like an ectopic pregnancy?鈥欌
ON AN EVENTUAL RISE IN BIRTH RATE
Dr. Beverly Gray
鈥淚 don鈥檛 think we鈥檙e prepared for nationally is an increased in birth rate. We鈥檙e already seeing rural hospitals closing.鈥
鈥淭hat鈥檚 another thing that, as medical providers across the country, we need to start thinking about how to prepare for more pregnancies.鈥
鈥淲e鈥檙e already seeing predictions that maternal mortality will increase in states where it鈥檚 already high. Many of those states that have high maternal mortality rates also have very strict abortion bans.鈥
鈥淚 think we need to be prepared for the future of obstetrics in our country.鈥
ON CONSEQUENCES OF ABORTION BAN ON RHEUMATOLOGY CARE
Dr. Megan Clowse
鈥淲omen with rheumatic disease, which is a large collection of autoimmune diseases in which the immune system is attacking a woman鈥檚 own body, can have a lot of complications during pregnancy.鈥
鈥淲e see high rates of pregnancies lost, preterm birth, stillbirth, preeclampsia and severe health consequences both short term and long term for both the mother and the baby.鈥
鈥淎bortion bans really change the landscape of rheumatic care for women of reproductive age. Not just the women who are pregnant or want to be pregnant, but all women of reproductive age because so many of our medications either can, we know, impact pregnancy with complications, or might.鈥
鈥淪ome of our most commonly used medications, bedrock rheumatology medications 鈥 are known to increase birth defects when there鈥檚 first trimester exposure. I鈥檓 particularly concerned the use of these medications is going to decrease in women of reproductive age who are not trying to get pregnant, leading to increased medical complications and disability, organ failure and in some situations, premature death.鈥
ON ABORTION BAN EFFECTS ON PREGNANT WOMEN WITH CARDIAC DISEASE
Dr. Maria Small
鈥淪o many cardiac diseases can result in a much higher risk of death in pregnancy. So sometimes individuals who are pregnant, with a cardiac condition, need to have the option to terminate a pregnancy, to end a pregnancy, as a life-saving action for themselves.鈥
鈥淚n general, we know the safety of abortion relative to carrying a pregnancy to term is something that鈥檚 very important. People don鈥檛 necessarily realize there鈥檚 a 14-times higher risk of carrying a pregnancy to term in general compared to a termination of pregnancy, an abortion.鈥
鈥淭his is just part of women鈥檚 health care, care for pregnant individuals and postpartum individuals, that people don鈥檛 seem to be taking into account in this banning of this very important part of reproductive care.鈥
ON CARE COMPLICATIONS FROM AN ABORTION BAN
Beverly Gray
鈥淭here are a whole host of medical conditions that impact people of reproductive age. Until people have an understanding of what individuals are facing, it鈥檚 really hard to comprehend.鈥
鈥淲e all know or care for someone or love someone who鈥檚 had an abortion. I think when we鈥檙e allowed that window into people鈥檚 lives and understanding what they鈥檙e facing, we鈥檙e able to understand how decisions are made, how folks are approaching their lives and their futures.鈥
ON DETERMINING WHEN A PREGNANT WOMAN鈥橲 LIFE IS IN DANGER
Dr. Megan Clowse
鈥淧regnancies that threaten the life of a woman with rheumatic disease are surprisingly common. I probably see one or two women a year who conceive when their rheumatic disease is active to an extent that could lead to kidney damage or damage to another organ or can drive up her blood pressure dangerously high and put her at risk for stroke or a heart attack.鈥
鈥淥ften at the same time that the woman鈥檚 health is in danger, the pregnancy itself, the developing fetus, is also at very high risk for a very early delivery. Sometimes before it is viable and can survive outside the womb and sometimes in the first weeks of viability when it will require months in the intensive care nursery and likely, if they make it out alive, have long-term permanent consequences.鈥
鈥淭hese conversations with patients are really challenging. It鈥檚 not like a woman can walk in really early in pregnancy and I can say, 鈥榊ou for sure are going to have a catastrophic outcome.鈥欌
鈥淲here do you personally draw the line? Of your safety? Your ability to mother your existing children? Your ability to survive this pregnancy versus your desire to continue this specific pregnancy? How they weigh this specific pregnancy that will likely end in catastrophe versus a potential future pregnancy that could be very well planned and lead to a very successful delivery.鈥
鈥淭here鈥檚 a lot of nuance that physicians and patients really take very seriously. These are long conversations. These are hard conversations. These are conversations in which women involve their spouse. Involve their families. Involve their priests and pastors and other people who can really help guide them through these life-changing decisions. Different women pick different things.鈥
ON WHETHER 鈥楲ATE-TERM鈥 ABORTION IS A REAL THING
Dr. Beverly Gray
鈥淎 鈥榣ate-term abortion鈥 is not a medical term. It鈥檚 not a term that we physicians use. It鈥檚 a term that鈥檚 very politicized, that politicians use to make it appear that the vast majority of abortions are happening in the late second, third trimester. Which is absolutely not the case. We know the vast majority of abortion care that occurs in our country happens in the first eight weeks of pregnancy. Only 1.2 percent of care happens after 20 weeks, and that鈥檚 typically before viability. It鈥檚 right around the 20th week. In North Carolina that rate is even lower.鈥
鈥淭hose are the cases politicians want to talk about, that there鈥檚 this care happening right at term pregnancy. That鈥檚 not the case.鈥
鈥淲e take care of very sick, medically complicated patients all the time here in our institution. Many of those patients, they want to continue their pregnancies. They want to have hope for those pregnancies. We give them that hope.鈥
鈥淭hrowing around that term is kind of dangerous. I think politicians are trying to be doctors and using non-medical language to make it seem like something nefarious is happening. Which is not the case.鈥
ON THE POTENTIAL INCREASE OF ABORTION PILLS 鈥 AND ASSOCIATED RISKS
Dr. Megan Clowse
鈥淲omen who terminate, who do medical terminations at home and don鈥檛 let their doctor know 鈥 particularly in states where this might be illegal, I think that women are not going to be forthcoming with their providers, we will not really understand their risk landscape when they鈥檙e calling.鈥
鈥淲e鈥檙e not going to know how to help them have a successful pregnancy in the future. So I do think that鈥檚 risky and problematic.鈥
ON PHYSICIANS AFRAID OF PROVIDING TOO LITTLE CARE
Dr. Megan Clowse
鈥淚 think physicians are concerned about that. We go into becoming doctors in order to help our patients live the best lives that they can. Sometimes that means talking about abortion and helping patients access abortion. I think doctors are concerned that they鈥檙e not going to have the ability to do that for their patients, and that could lead to legal consequences for them. There鈥檚 a lot of talk in the other direction, but I think it鈥檚 important that we remember that when we provide substandard care to our patients, we do them a disservice and that puts all of us at some risk.鈥
ON INEQUITIES IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
Dr. Maria Small
鈥淭he whole idea that people being afraid they may be criminalized if they鈥檙e seeking out abortion care, even if they鈥檙e seeking out support related to how to self-manage termination. You have a scenario where people who may, because of previous injustices in the healthcare system, or previous mistrust of the healthcare system, are contributing to some of the maternal mortality in the United States. And you have a scenario where you鈥檝e placed individuals in an adversarial position that may even involve law enforcement. That鈥檚 a very dangerous situation for communities of color.鈥
鈥淭his environment of placing pregnant and potentially pregnant individuals in this kind of toxic relationship with healthcare providers is one that is only going to worsen maternal mortality 鈥 for Black women in America.鈥
ON COMPLICATING MISCARRIAGE CARE
Dr. Beverly Gray
鈥淭he medications that we use for miscarriage management are absolutely the same as the ones we used for medication abortion care.鈥
鈥淭he process of someone鈥檚 body having a miscarriage versus going through the normal process of medication abortion, there鈥檚 no litmus test that you can say, 鈥極h, this patient had a miscarriage, or not.鈥欌
鈥淭hat worries patients. They wonder, will doctors know what鈥檚 going on with my body? Will they test me for these medications? It doesn鈥檛 even matter because those are the same medications we use for miscarriage.鈥
ON THE BIGGEST CONCERN NOW
Dr. Maria Small
鈥淢ental health. This is an area that is garnering, appropriately, additional attention in our country.鈥
鈥淪evere maternal morbidity is associated with a higher risk for maternal conditions like depression and even Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. These are things that are life-threatening, that don鈥檛 cause death, but they would cause death if they weren鈥檛 treated.鈥
鈥淵ou鈥檙e asking individuals to be pushed to the brink of death 鈥. because a legislator has deemed that be the case. That is something that really concerns me, it troubles me.鈥
鈥淚 think we just have no sense of just how bad this is going to impact individuals in our country.鈥
ON THE FUTURE OF OB-GYN CARE
Dr. Beverly Gray
鈥淚n states like Texas and others that already had a strict ban in place, they鈥檙e seeing how those changes are happening right before their eyes. They鈥檙e seeing patients鈥 lives being put at risk on a daily basis. They鈥檙e having to give patients non evidence-based advice and recommendations because their state legislators are saying that鈥檚 the right thing to do.鈥
鈥淵ou don鈥檛 know what a patient is experiencing or going through. You can鈥檛 imagine it until you鈥檙e facing it yourself. That trust between a patient and their physician or their healthcare provider needs to be reinstated. There鈥檚 this idea that a ban will make care safer for the patient 鈥 that鈥檚 absolutely not true at all. In fact it makes care less safe. It will likely increase maternal mortality in this country.鈥
鈥淚t鈥檚 not just a simple question of right or wrong. This is a complicated issue and people feel differently about it, but we have to let patients have autonomy over their lives.鈥
Faculty Participants
Megan Clowse, M.D.
is a rheumatologist with Duke Health and an associate professor in the Department of Medicine at the Duke School of Medicine. She treats patients who are pregnant, or want to become pregnant, and have a rheumatic disease.
Contact: sarah.avery@duke.edu
Beverly Gray, M.D.
is an obstetrician and gynecologist, an associate professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Duke School of Medicine, and founder of the Duke Reproductive Health Equity and Advocacy Mobilization team.
Contact: sarah.avery@duke.edu
Maria Small, M.D.
is an obstetrician and gynecologist and an associate professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Duke, where she is a maternal and fetal medicine specialist.
Contact: sarah.avery@duke.edu
_ _ _ _
Duke experts on a variety of topics can be found
Follow Duke News on Twitter: