老牛影视

Skip to main content

Former White House Official: 'The Delay in Transition is not Helpful'

Professors who worked in Republican and Democratic administrations discuss election results

Peter Feaver and Bruce Jentleson
Peter Feaver and Bruce Jentleson

As the Trump administration continues its flurry of largely evidence-free allegations of widespread voter fraud and rigged voting results, President-elect Joe Biden is left to wait for some of the resources needed for his official transition to the White House.

As the clock ticks, two Duke professors with experience in previous White House administrations discussed the impact the transition delay will have on the nation鈥檚 handling of the pandemic, national security and other important issues.

The two political scientists discussed these issues Wednesday on a virtual media briefing with journalists. Watch the briefing on .

Here are excerpts:

ON DELAY OF THE WHITE HOUSE TRANSITION

Professor Bruce Jentleson, former senior adviser, U.S. State Department

鈥淭ransitions have two main purposes. Affirmation and preparation. Affirmation is that handshake that in every other instance has occurred right after the election between the outgoing president and the president-elect. The notion that the constitutional system is working. We fight hard but we play by the rules. A very high-level version of why Duke and UNC basketball players shake hands at the end of the game. We鈥檙e not seeing any of that.鈥

鈥淭he fundamental effect of that is extremely negative.鈥

Professor Peter Feaver, former adviser, George W. Bush administration, Bill Clinton administration

鈥淭he delay in transition is not helpful. The good news is the Biden team is the A Team. They have a lot of governing experience among them. If there was going to be an incoming team that could overcome this problem well, I would say that鈥檚 the Biden team.鈥

鈥淚 have confidence the Biden team is not sitting around waiting.鈥

 

ON FIRINGS, RESIGNATIONS THIS WEEK OF SEVERAL DEFENSE DEPARTMENT LEADERS

Peter Feaver

鈥淭his is a legal move by the president. It鈥檚 within his prerogatives. It鈥檚 not a wise move for him. It鈥檚 hurting him, it鈥檚 hurting his legacy and it鈥檚 hurting his party鈥檚 future capacity to hold the Biden administration accountable, doing these kinds of stunts.鈥

鈥淚 do not believe he鈥檚 clearing the path to use the military to hold power. You鈥檇 need to do a lot more than just replace a couple people at the top.鈥

鈥淚 do think it鈥檚 possible that what he鈥檚 doing is just settling scores, and doing it just because people are telling him he can鈥檛 do it. Many people who work for the president say that鈥檚 the one way you can get him to act. If you tell him he鈥檚 not able to do X, he鈥檚 going to do X.鈥

鈥淚t鈥檚 possible he wants to do some policies that are unwise 鈥 and he鈥檚 trying to clear the decks to do those policies.鈥

鈥淭he final possibility is the president himself is not even paying attention to these personnel moves. He may not know who the person acting as undersecretary of policy is. It may be people lower around him in the White House looking to burnish their resumes.鈥

 

ON DELAYS BY THE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION IN SETTING BIDEN鈥橲 TRANSITION IN MOTION

Bruce Jentleson

鈥淭here鈥檚 much work (the Biden team) can do. It鈥檚 a lot of people with a lot of policy experience. But you take an issue like COVID. I would think almost any other outgoing president, given the crisis the country has been in 鈥. would be trying to work with the incoming administration.鈥

鈥淪ure, you can do some of your homework, do some of your analysis. But there鈥檚 only one president at a time. It鈥檚 like passing a baton in a relay race. There鈥檚 a way to do this the right way. What Trump is doing is making this harder, not only for the Biden team but for the country.鈥

Peter Feaver

鈥淭he really critical thing they鈥檙e preventing is the landing teams from connecting up from the receiving teams at each of these departments and agencies, who have been preparing up until now, and start briefing the Biden people.鈥

鈥淚t will increase the likelihood that a ball might be dropped. There鈥檚 just no point in making it harder.鈥

 

ON THE ROLE OF THE MILITARY IN ELECTION/TRANSITION

Peter Feaver

鈥淭he military is prepared to implement every legal order that President Trump gives up until noon on Inauguration Day. President Trump is the commander in chief today, legally and constitutionally empowered.鈥

鈥淭he military does not have a role, a constitutional role in the selection of the commander in chief. The Constitution lays out a process for that and there鈥檚 no role for the military in that process. I don鈥檛 foresee it coming to that. It鈥檚 a political process.鈥

鈥淭here鈥檚 legal aspects. 鈥 There鈥檚 a role for courts; there鈥檚 a role for legislatures. There鈥檚 not a role for U.S. military.鈥

 

ON GOP LEADERS SUGGESTING THE ELECTION RESULT ISN鈥橳 VALID YET

Bruce Jentleson

鈥淚 think the person most responsible for right now for this is Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Part of their strategy, what鈥檚 going on right now is positioning for 2024, who might inherit the Trump constituency, and positioning for the two (upcoming) Georgia (U.S. Senate) runoffs.鈥

鈥淚t is politics but there鈥檚 a point at which it鈥檚 deeply irresponsible for Mitch McConnell to be doing what he鈥檚 doing and setting a tone for the other Republican senators.鈥

 

ON WHO THE MILITARY TAKES ORDERS FROM

Peter Feaver

鈥淯p until 11:59 a.m. (on Inauguration Day) they will take the order from President Trump and implement it. At 12 p.m. they will take the order from then-President Biden.鈥

鈥淭he military will obey legal orders. They will refuse to carry out illegal orders. The more likely scenario is not a patently illegal order but an unwise order. Let鈥檚 say the president says, 鈥楤ring all the troops home from Afghanistan by Christmas regardless of what happens to our allies, regardless of what happens to the peace process, I want to brag that I brought all the troops home.鈥 There鈥檚 no serious military adviser who thinks it would be wise 鈥 so they would advise against it. But that would be a legal order.鈥

鈥淚 believe the U.S. military would carry that out, grudgingly, and the country would pay a price for it.鈥

鈥淭here鈥檚 many unwise orders that are legal, and the military carries them out.鈥

 

ON MIKE POMPEO COMMENTS ABOUT PREPARING FOR A 2ND TRUMP TERM

Peter Feaver

鈥淚 think he was trying for a joke. He smiled right afterwards. I think it鈥檚 a joke that fell flat.鈥

鈥淲hen you鈥檙e secretary of state and the situation is as tense as it is now, that鈥檚 probably not the time to go for the joke.鈥

鈥淚 do think that this is complicating our ability to hold other states accountable when they have electoral monkey business.鈥

 

ON UNCALLED RACES IN NORTH CAROLINA AND ELSEWHERE

Peter Feaver

鈥淓ver since the call of Florida had to be withdrawn (in 2000), that put a lot of pressure on decision desks to be very, very careful in not making calls prematurely. This is an area where the price of being first and wrong is so very high.鈥

鈥淔ox News, who went early and probably prematurely in calling Arizona for Biden 鈥 they called that quite early and it was sort of a tilting-over-your-skis sort of call.鈥

鈥淭his is a very close election in certain key states. Georgia is a very, very close margin. And it鈥檚 an unusual election in that late-arriving ballots or late-counted ballots may matter. It shouldn鈥檛 be shocking that news organizations and certifying agencies 鈥 are being cautious. That鈥檚 not contributing to America鈥檚 poor standing in the world. The question, though, is that providing cover for a more partisan reaction to it, and perhaps it is.鈥

Bruce Jentleson

鈥淎t the presidential level there鈥檚 huge incentive (for news outlets) to being first and they really have to manage that. Down ballot, the incentive is all on not making a mistake. In North Carolina, Gov. Cooper won but by less than the polls suggested. People are being very cautious about the races. The incentives are getting it right.鈥

 

ON HOW A TRANSITION DELAY HURTS FAMILIES

Bruce Jentleson

鈥淥ne is COVID. We鈥檙e in the middle of a surge.鈥

鈥淏y the time President Biden will be able to deal with this Jan. 20, it will be that much more severe and harder to get a handle on.鈥

鈥淭he second is the economy. The inability to put together a second economic financial package for small businesses, for jobs. Everybody鈥檚 blaming everybody else.鈥

鈥淚f we had an election result. 鈥 Sometimes you get things done in lame-duck sessions you don鈥檛 get done otherwise. You could get this economic package done.鈥

鈥淭hird, the way the signals from the White House still leave the door open to serious civil/political violence. The Proud Boys and other groups like that. I worry a lot about that, and that effects the typical American family.鈥

Peter Feaver

鈥淎 lot of what the administration is doing is harmful to the country in the long run. But what鈥檚 really harmful to the country in the short run and to the average American family is what the administration鈥檚 not doing.鈥

鈥淏ecause they鈥檙e not focusing on governing in the next two months, working with Congress to try to get a stimulus package of some sort passed. Because they鈥檙e not taking the COVID spike seriously, because they鈥檙e not doing all those things and instead they鈥檙e distracting the president鈥檚 attention and the remaining energy of the administration in another direction, (those are) the things hurting the average American family.鈥

鈥淚n the long run it won鈥檛 help Americans to lose confidence in their electoral process, to believe voting doesn鈥檛 matter. That will hurt the country in the long run.鈥

 

ON HOW A DELAY WILL HURT THE COVID RESPONSE

Peter Feaver

鈥淚鈥檓 not a public health expert. The public health experts I trust and read say we need to take dramatic action now. Action now will have a meaningful dampening effect on the spread of the virus. We have great news with a vaccine that appears to be effective.鈥

鈥淭here鈥檚 a lot that needs to be done and that if it isn鈥檛 being done, people will die. When Vice President Biden called for a national mask-wearing mandate 鈥 if President Trump were to change his messaging on masks and embrace that, it could have a powerful effect.鈥

鈥淭his was one of the great successes of the Bush administration that people forget. The Bush administration was dealing with a financial crisis at the end of its term and was handing over a financial crisis and economic challenge to (President) Obama. They managed that handover very well; the decisions being made about dealing with the financial crisis were well coordinated across Bush and Obama, so that when Obama came in, yes he faced a serious financial and economic challenge, but it was less serious than it would have been without that responsible action and inter-administration coordination between the two. That鈥檚 the kind of thing we should be asking for now.鈥

 

ON DAMAGE TO TRADITIONAL NORMS

Bruce Jentleson

鈥淚 don鈥檛 think anything is ever damaged beyond repair. But the number of falsehoods and lies this president has told throughout his administration, culminating with what we鈥檙e seeing now -- if a future president lied 10 percent as much we might consider that an improvement. That鈥檚 not good.鈥

鈥淭here鈥檚 fault on both sides. Democrats are far from angels. But the damage this administration has done to the electoral process. The voter suppression efforts that have been going on 鈥 we all play to win. But there are ways of playing to win that may bend a rule, but don鈥檛 break.鈥

鈥淭here are certain norms spouses have with each other, or parents have with children. And we all know when you break those norms it makes relationships that much harder.鈥

 

ON TRANSITIONS IN THIS TIME OF CRISIS

Peter Feaver

鈥淚n order to deal with the pandemic and the economic crisis 鈥 you need to have both branches of government, the executive branch and the legislative branch, working together and making compromises. One of the norms I saw challenged over the last four years that鈥檚 troubling is that it鈥檚 OK to compromise.鈥

鈥淐ompromise is not an abdication with the enemy. Compromise with the other political party is not evil. That requirement 鈥 compromise is built in, that鈥檚 what our founding documents required was compromise. In the last four years we鈥檝e seen that become so sharply attacked by both sides but especially by the Trump administration.鈥

 

ON WHAT HAPPENS JAN. 20 IF TRUMP DOESN鈥橳 CONCEDE

Peter Feaver

鈥(President Trump) does not have to go to the inauguration. There does not have to be a parade, there does not have to be a ceremony.鈥

鈥淎s of 12 p.m. on Inauguration Day he is no longer president. To stay in the White House, you have to be cleared by the Secret Service to be there. So as of 12:01 he has to be invited by then-President Biden to stay in the White House. If not, he鈥檒l be escorted off the premises by the Secret Service. I鈥檓 sure he does not want to see the image of him being frog-marched off the compound.鈥

鈥淚t鈥檚 more likely that he will have already decamped to Mar-a-Lago many, many weeks earlier, and he will be tweeting. But he will not be tweeting from the White House proper.鈥

Meet the experts

Peter Feaver
 is a professor of political science and public policy. He was a special adviser for strategic planning and institutional reform on the National Security Council staff in the George W. Bush administration from 2005-2007, and was director for defense policy and arms control in the Clinton administration from 1993-1994. Feaver directs the .

Bruce Jentleson
 is a professor of public policy and political science who was a senior adviser at the State Department from 2009-2011. He served on the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama in 2012 and Al Gore in 2000, and worked in the State Department from 1993-94. Jentleson is author of 鈥