Orhan Pamuk answers questions from Duke Professor Erdag Goknar Thursday at the Nasher Museum. Photo by Les Todd/Duke Photography
Sitting before a full auditorium in the Nasher Museum of Art, Turkish author Orhan Pamuk smiled playfully. He had just been asked about his writing process.
鈥淚 revealed the entire plot of my new novel on the first page,鈥 Pamuk, who received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2006, said. 鈥淔or me, the plot is never the most important part of the novel. A novel is a galaxy of little details that the author wants to talk about. The plot is the tree that holds together the details, which [ultimately] motivate the writer.鈥
Pamuk added that he obsessively collects these details in all of his novels, and his latest release, 鈥溾 is no exception. It follows Mevlut, a street vendor of boza, a fermented wheat-based drink, and his life in the rapidly growing Istanbul of the past four decades. Along the way, of course, Pamuk 鈥渃ollects鈥 various details from Istanbul鈥檚 transformation from a city of 2.5 million to today鈥檚 global metropolis of 15 million.
Earlier in the week, Pamuk participated in a public Q&A with (DUMESC) director and Turkish Studies professor Erda臒 G枚knar. .The week鈥檚 other Pamuk-themed events included a screening of Grant Gee鈥檚 鈥溾 and a panel discussion with Duke faculty at the Franklin Humanities Institute.
G枚knar鈥檚 conversation with Pamuk encompassed a variety of topics, from the author鈥檚 experiences living in Istanbul to the process of researching a novel. Following G枚knar鈥檚 prepared questions, Pamuk answered questions from the audience.
Like many of Pamuk鈥檚 novels, 鈥淎 Strangeness in My Mind鈥 is deeply rooted in the social and historical context of Istanbul, where the author has lived his entire life. G枚knar, who also translated Pamuk鈥檚 acclaimed historical novel 鈥淢y Name is Red鈥漣nto English, said 鈥淎 Strangeness in My Mind鈥 is particularly relevant to those who wish to understand the historical roots of Turkey鈥檚 ruling religiously conservative Justice and Development Party鈥檚 (AKP) voter base.
鈥淚 find Pamuk鈥檚 novels fascinating because they open up new literary sub-genres,鈥 G枚knar said. 鈥淔or example, 鈥楢 Strangeness in My Mind鈥 doubles as a social history of Istanbul and the urban lower middle class that formed the AKP鈥檚 voter base beginning in [the early 2000s]. At the same time, he is able to step away from the social history and focus on pushing the boundaries of the novel form [through a] variety of literary techniques.鈥
Pamuk said the background research he conducted for this novel, which included interviewing street vendors, was especially enjoyable, as he took great pleasure in combining these firsthand accounts with his own experiences in Istanbul. Ultimately, Pamuk observed, writing traverses the space between the author鈥檚 memories and his imagination.
鈥淲hen you start writing a novel, you cannot see a tree with thousands of fully developed leaves,鈥 Pamuk said. 鈥淵ou can maybe see some of the trunk and branches. The leaves come from your memory [and] the limits of your memory determine the limits of your imagination.鈥
And despite living in Istanbul for more than six decades, Pamuk still finds that the best way to nourish his memory and imagination is to explore the city.
鈥淐ities do not have essential attributes,鈥 Pamuk said. 鈥淭he only thing about Istanbul that has never changed is the breeze and vitality of the Bosphorus [strait]. Everything else is changing.
鈥淎s a novelist, I have to keep my tentacles open to all the details of [these changes] and constantly write them.鈥
For more information about upcoming DUMESC events, click . For more information about Orhan Pamuk, .